tun2socks on Win7 doesn't work
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue · comments
Google Code Exporter commented
Hi, I'm Ezio, and I've a problem with tun2socks. I've tryed different
configurations and the tun2socks always stuck with this debug message:
-----
C:\Utils\badvpn-win32\bin>badvpn-tun2socks.exe --tundev
"tap0901:tap:10.0.0.1:10.0.0.0:255.255.255.0" --netif-ipaddr 10.0.0.2
--netif-netmask 255.255.255.0 --socks-server-addr 192.168.33.252:1080
--loglevel 5
NOTICE(tun2socks): initializing BadVPN tun2socks 1.999.111
DEBUG(BReactor): Reactor initializing
DEBUG(BSignal): BSignal initializing
INFO(BTap): Looking for TAP-Win32 with component ID tap0901, name tap
INFO(BTap): Opening device \\.\Global\{BCDB3D4A-FF30-4C40-B02D-9149E9A68B5D}.tap
INFO(BTap): Device opened
NOTICE(tun2socks): entering event loop
DEBUG(BReactor): Entering event loop
DEBUG(tun2socks): lwip init
DEBUG(tun2socks): netif func init
DEBUG(BReactor): GetQueuedCompletionStatus timed out
DEBUG(BReactor): Dispatching timer
DEBUG(tun2socks): TCP timer
DEBUG(BReactor): GetQueuedCompletionStatus timed out
DEBUG(BReactor): Dispatching timer
DEBUG(tun2socks): TCP timer
DEBUG(BReactor): GetQueuedCompletionStatus timed out
DEBUG(BReactor): Dispatching timer
DEBUG(tun2socks): TCP timer
... and so on
-----
The Os that I've used is a Windows 7 Professional 64bit SP0 with UAC enabled.
I've tryed to change this variables when I've tryed to get tun2socks work, on
every combination:
- I've launched the tun2socks from administrative shell and from the user's one.
- I've used the OpenVPN tap device (that on my system is called "OpenVPN") and
a new tap device created from "OpenVPN/Utility/Add a new TAP virtual ethernet
adapter", called "tap"
- I've used the suggested network for tap device (10.0.0.0) and another private
network (the one that I want to use: 192.168.254.0)
- I've used a "lan" socks5 proxy (192.168.33.252:1080) and a local ssh socks5
proxy (127.0.0.1:1080)
tun2socks stucks with the message reported before, and the tap device specified
is shown in connection manager as connected, but without ip address, mask and
gw. The packets count is also 0 for in and 0 for out.
bye,
Ezio
Original issue reported on code.google.com by ezio.bo...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2012 at 8:59
Google Code Exporter commented
It appears that tun2socks is not receiving any packets from the operating
system. Have you followed tun2socks my guide on the wiki? It explicitly says
that you have to assign the right IP address to the TUN device yourself
(10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 for the command line you posted), and it does
not appear you did so. You also set up the routes properly.
Please try the guide first and report problems after you're sure you did
exactly what it says.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 21 Mar 2012 at 9:28
- Changed state: Invalid
Google Code Exporter commented
[deleted comment]
Google Code Exporter commented
maskeye, in your case too the OS is not sending any packets into the Local
interface. You have to adjust the routing table properly. Either add the
route(s) you want manually, via the gateway 10.0.0.2, or configure it as a
default gateway in the IP configuration dialog for the Local interface. Anyway,
it would help if you provided your routing table (route print) and IP
configurations of both interfaces (write down or screenshot).
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 12:11
Google Code Exporter commented
maskeye, it's likely that your metrics are incorrect and that the OS is still
using the default gateway of "Local Area Connection". There are multiple ways
to achieve the desired routing; one is by forcing the new tun2socks route to
have a lower metric than the existing "Local Area Connection" route.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 12:13
Google Code Exporter commented
Alternatively, you can remove the default gateway from "Local Area Connection"
and only have the tun2socks route. However this is inconvenient when you want
to not use tun2socks.
Original comment by ambr...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 12:15
Google Code Exporter commented
It works great on my computer. I can share my ssh internet connection trough
wifi hotspot with this tiny tools. Just a little tricks and we can enjoy shared
ssh internet connection. Haturnuhuun mas bro..o
Original comment by ay1...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2013 at 5:13