Test task is generated though it is not defined
fithisux opened this issue · comments
My FOSS tutorial project here comes with a README.
https://github.com/fithisux/omdb_scheduled_dbt
job_names_with_types task group has a test.
But I have not defined any.
Side note: the whole dag with cosmos fails, though if I connect to docker and execute the dbt commands (deps, seed, run, test), it does not fail.
To address the unexpected test task generation and the DAG failure in your omdb_scheduled_dbt
project, consider the following adjustments:
-
Unexpected Test Task Generation: This issue might be due to the default
test_behavior
setting in Cosmos, which automatically generates a test task after each model run. You can modify this behavior by adjusting thetest_behavior
setting in your Cosmos configuration to a value that suits your project's needs, preventing the automatic generation of test tasks if undesired. -
DAG Failure with Cosmos Execution: The failure when executing the DAG with Cosmos, as opposed to manual dbt commands in Docker, suggests a possible misalignment in the execution environment configuration. Ensure that the
execution_mode
in your Cosmos configuration reflects the actual environment you're using (e.g., Docker). If your project runs in a containerized environment, settingexecution_mode
toExecutionMode.DOCKER
or similar might resolve the issue.
By reviewing and adjusting the test_behavior
and execution_mode
settings in your Cosmos configuration, you should be able to align Cosmos's behavior with your project's requirements and resolve the issues you've encountered.
Details
Sources
About Dosu
This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.
Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.
To continue the conversation, mention @dosu.
The change seems to have done the trick
render_config = RenderConfig(
emit_datasets=False,
test_behavior=TestBehavior.AFTER_ALL,
),
though, it was not clear to me why the TestBehavior.AFTER_EACH
did not work.
Code pushed to the repository above for whoever would like to test.