Please create a template/standar for PR reviewing.

[Pablo Calvo]

I think we should agree on a form of PRs for translations. If you look at the current PR list it is very hard to see wherever it is a translation PR and for what language, and I have to see one by one to check if I can either review or contribute..

I am thinking of:

[Translation] [<Language>] : <What are you translating?>

Example:

[Translation] [Spanish]: Binary search article.

[Pablo Calvo]

I would be happy to also use the language code instead of the full language name:

• en-US
• es-LA
• pt-BR

and so

[William Kennedy]

That is a good point. I'll send an email to everyone to review this issue

[Lucio Moraes]

Agreed

[Elena Grahovac]

Great idea!

[Dipanda Aser]

I agree about this.

May be the language should match the case used on the language branch name.

[Translation] [spanish] : <What are you translating?>
[Translation] [portuguese-brazil] : <What are you translating?>

[Sergio Filho]

sounds good to me as well to use language codes.

[Jyotsna Gupta]

Agreed. We can use language code. but we'll need to mention it somewhere (as in the PR Guidelines doc) or there may be some link for reference. I found this: https://developers.google.com/admin-sdk/directory/v1/languages

[Tushar Dahiya]

agreed, the google article language codes seems pretty fine and standard enough