Project Archiving?

[monicabritton]

Maybe I missed something, but how do I archive a project? It isn't a "status" choice, and the list doesn't change if I check or uncheck "Show archived".

Thanks,

M

[Matt Settles]

You have to edit then archive, needs to be streamlined

On Friday, September 16, 2016, monicabritton [e-mail]
wrote:

Maybe I missed something, but how do I archive a project? It isn't a
"status" choice, and the list doesn't change if I check or uncheck "Show
archived".

Thanks,

M

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5nC4h8JQcq5cOOwM6eNnFye_VUsUks5qqzpMgaJpZM4J_dvn
.

Sent from Gmail Mobile on my IPAD Mini 4

[Adam]

What would be preferred? An archive button on the project page?

[monicabritton]

How about an "Archive/Unarchive" button (or icon) on the main page for each project? (Presuming it can't be added to the "status" choices.)

[Matt Settles]

What would be the argument on not having it as a status?

Removed it from status because there was also an archive (working one) onn
the project page. I'd advocate removing the archive on the project page and
only have archive as a status.

M

On Sep 21, 2016 5:47 PM, "monicabritton" [e-mail] wrote:

How about an "Archive/Unarchive" button (or icon) on the main page for
each project? (Presuming it can't be added to the "status" choices.)

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5vhPEvFp1sStTzJRFQD1R-mDZJa7ks5qsdAGgaJpZM4J_dvn
.

[Adam]

The reasons for having archive separate are:

1. Statuses can be customized per project type, and may not always contain an archived option. The system needs something consistent to rely upon for this behavior.
2. It may be desirable to archive a project, while maintaining a meaningful status.

It seems the chief complaint is making the archive functionality more accessible. I can make that a click of a button from the project page, or even the projectS page.

[Matt Settles]

Agree with all you said

On Sep 22, 2016 9:50 AM, "Adam Schaal" [e-mail] wrote:

The reasons for having archive separate are:

1. Statuses can be customized per project type, and may not always contain
   an archived option. The system needs something consistent to rely upon for
   this behavior.
2. It may be desirable to archive a project, while maintaining a
   meaningful status.

It seems the chief complaint is making the archive functionality more
accessible. I can make that a click of a button from the project page, or
even the projectS page.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#27 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAno5o-Q0r5DHOk7MRFgrl2GY-RaHysUks5qsrG7gaJpZM4J_dvn
.