benchmark

[RegulusStar]

redis-benchmark -n 1000000 -t set,get -P 16 -q

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2682 v4 @ 2.50GHz 2 Core
4G RAM
SSDB Disk

redis-5.0.3
SET: 548245.62 requests per second
GET: 671140.94 requests per second

redix V1.7
SET: 6992.27 requests per second
GET: 188323.92 requests per second

redix V1.8 (use leveldb -engine=level)
SET: 166334.00 requests per second
GET: 280190.53 requests per second

ssdb 1.9.7
SET: 34694.52 requests per second
GET: 35812.77 requests per second

[Mohammed Al Ashaal]

Thank you @RegulusStar

Could you try it with the new engine in v1.8 redix -engine=leveldb?

leveldb is using leveldb, and I think that it is faster

[Mohammed Al Ashaal]

Using redix -engine=leveldb

# redis
➜ redis-benchmark -n 1000000 -t set,get -P 16 -p 6379 -q
SET: 287687.00 requests per second
GET: 316455.69 requests per second

# redix
➜ redis-benchmark -n 1000000 -t set,get -P 16 -p 6380 -q 
SET: 137816.98 requests per second
GET: 235626.77 requests per second

[JeffProd]

[JeffProd]

Could you use level as default ?

[Mohammed Al Ashaal]

In my opinion, we should keep redix versions compatible with each other.

[Mohammed Al Ashaal]

I'll try to perform aggressive optimization in redix to achieve more speed, but we won't achieve redis speed easily because redis = ram, but redix = disk, and ram is faster than disk.

But redix isn't limited to ram

[一路有你]

the release 1.8 version label show error in cli
redix server version: 1.7

MacBookPro 2018 16G Mem 512G ssd
redis-benchmark -n 1000000 -t set,get -P 16 -p 6380 -q SET: 323519.88 requests per second GET: 1078748.62 requests per second

very good