License

[dinger1986]

Hello, I wanted to include this list in a project I am doing but wanted to check if it's permitted as there is no license published.

MIT might be appropriate?

Thanks

[Mathew Heard]

Thats a valid point. I think MIT would be appropriate mostly.

My only issue is that it mentions software in the license. Something that this is not.

I'll take suggestions from the community.

[dinger1986]

maybe creative commons then? Its funny cause alot of people use MIT on github and sometimes isnt really appropriate, thanks for replying though :)

[Mathew Heard]

We are all guilty of that. IANAL but MIT matches with my wishes.

[Pascal]

Hi,
Also interested here, for similar reasons :)

[Rudolf Hofland]

Hi,

Also interested. Any updates?

[Mathew Heard]

A license has been added along with clarification on what "software" means in the context of the applied MIT license.