[Question]: Procedural macros support structs with / without lifetime annotations
dclong opened this issue · comments
Is there any example of using darling to develop procedural macros which support structs both with and without lifetime annotations?
You can see how derive-builder handles generics (both type parameters and lifetimes) in its codegen here.
darling
doesn't provide lifetime examples because those aren't really in this crate's area of focus: darling
is focused on helping you turn an input AST into a useful representation for your own codegen. You can read generics using the generics
magic field when deriving FromDeriveInput
or the ty
field when deriving FromField
, both of which will give you access to lifetime information.
There is darling::usage::UsesLifetimes
, which can be helpful if you allow users to tell your macro to ignore/skip fields from the DeriveInput
, as it'll tell you which lifetimes are relevant to the output you're emitting.