It would be nice not to have to depend on jmock when writing a BDD-style test involving no mocks

[Google Code Exporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. Write a BDD-flavoured test involving no mocks, e.g. the storer example from:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GROOVY/Using+Instinct+with+Groovy

2. Run the spec

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Would like this:

- should_reverse_lists (FAILED)
    java.lang.AssertionError: Expression: (reversed == expectedReverse).
Values: reversed = [5, 3, 1], expectedReverse = [5, 3, 2]

Intead, see this:

Caught: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/jmock/api/ExpectationError

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

0.1.5

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [e-mail] on 20 Oct 2007 at 9:19

[Google Code Exporter]

Hmmm, is the problem including another dependency (jMock, etc.) when you don't 
need to or using jMock?

Original comment by [e-mail] on 21 Oct 2007 at 10:30

[Google Code Exporter]

Yes, jmock's ExpectationError has been borrowed for non-mocking scenarios. So 
even
when I don't have a single (direct) use of jmock it is now a runtime dependency 
that
didn't exist in 0.1.4.

Original comment by [e-mail] on 4 Dec 2007 at 4:56

[Google Code Exporter]

Fixed by not depending on jMock explicitly.

Original comment by [e-mail] on 16 Jul 2008 at 5:57

• Changed state: Fixed