sync with FDAM8 data
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue · comments
Google Code Exporter commented
Synchronize with FDAM8 data after 2010-apr WG2 meeting 56.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by markus.icu
on 20 Apr 2010 at 11:18
Google Code Exporter commented
r196: mapping changes from N3829 items 10, 12, 13, 15
Original comment by markus.icu
on 22 Apr 2010 at 9:29
Google Code Exporter commented
r197: changes from N3828 (FPDAM8 disp. of comments) DE: T1,T2; JP:
T8,G11d,G11f; US:
T5a&b,E2
Original comment by markus.icu
on 23 Apr 2010 at 11:10
- Changed state: Started
Google Code Exporter commented
r198: try better implementation of JP G11f, without disunification
Original comment by markus.icu
on 24 Apr 2010 at 4:53
Google Code Exporter commented
r199: changes from N3828 (FPDAM8 disp. of comments) Emoticons via import of
FDAM8
NamesList
Original comment by markus.icu
on 24 Apr 2010 at 9:33
Google Code Exporter commented
r200: remove obsolete cross reference (should be to U+26A0 now, if anything)
Original comment by markus.icu
on 26 Apr 2010 at 4:48
Google Code Exporter commented
I believe I am done. Kat and others, it would be good if you could compare the
disposition docs with the changes listed here.
Original comment by markus.icu
on 27 Apr 2010 at 8:40
- Changed state: Fixed
Google Code Exporter commented
r203: remove remnant of temporary change from r197/r198
Original comment by markus.icu
on 28 Apr 2010 at 5:39
Google Code Exporter commented
I've kooked at r196, r97, r198, r199, r200, and r203.
The all looked OK and reflect the state of the Emoji proposal after 2010-04-22
meeting of ISO/SC2/WG2 in San
Jose, CA.
A word of caution: the verification work is tedious and involves comparing
several documents to these changes
submitted here. There may be a human error or omission -- inadvertently. So if
anyone else has the time to look
over them, I recommend it. A 2nd or 3rd eye would be really good given a fairly
large number of changes.
Thanks!
Original comment by katmomoi
on 29 Apr 2010 at 5:27
- Changed state: Verified
Google Code Exporter commented
Looked at r196-r200. Minor glyph difference (emojidata.pdf vs N3838) noted in
r199, don't think this is a big
problem. Otherwise looks good.
Original comment by pedb...@apple.com
on 7 May 2010 at 7:27