ReScience / MLRC

Editorial venue for ML Reproducibility Challenge Accepted papers

Home Page:https://openreview.net/group?id=ML_Reproducibility_Challenge

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

[togt2022badder] Some questions

thesofakillers opened this issue · comments

Hi, we are going through the process of preparing our pull requests. Some questions:

  1. There is a typo in our title metadata (link) (I think inherited from openreview, this is our fault, sorry): there is a missing space between "Methods" and "for", resulting in "Methodsfor". I can fix this as part of my pull request of course. Would that be ok?
  2. On the topic of the title, i see from the checklist that the title should start with "[RE]". We weren't aware of this requirement in the openreview process and as a result our title is different. Should we change it to include "[RE]"? I.e. is this a hard constraint? If so, I suppose we should also definitely change it in the accepted.bib file? Or will that mess with the key?

Thanks

  1. Also, what should we commit to the PR? Just the contents of the <paper_citekey> folder?

Hi @thesofakillers,

  1. Yes it would be perfectly okay.
  2. No worries, the requirement of title to start with [Re] is specific to ReScience. You should change the title now but only for the camera ready process (no need to update in OpenReview/accepted.bib).
  3. Yes, you should commit only the contents of <paper_citeky> folder.

Ok thanks. I've submitted the PR :)