Status of this project
ntarocco opened this issue · comments
Are you still maintaining this project? Is it something that we can rely on when building products?
Looks bad :( - the last commit was almost a year ago and the tests don't run against 3.12 even though there's a PR which apparently fixes it.
Friendly ping @tfeldmann @willmcgugan @althonos @odgalvin
Yeah to be honest I'm migrating my projects away from pyfilesystem. Nowadays I mount remote filesystems locally and handle them with the standard library. For tests I migrated to pyfakefs
instead of using MemoryFS
.
@tfeldmann I'm mainly interested in MemoryFs for creating temporary files, packaging files and reducing disk i/o for applications. I wonder if pyfakefs
can be used as a regular lib outside of pytest
.
I'm using it only with pytest at the moment. But something like this could work:
from pathlib import Path
from pyfakefs.fake_filesystem_unittest import patchfs
@patchfs()
def sometempstuff(fs):
path = Path("./testfile.txt")
print(type(path))
path.write_text("Hello World")
return (path.read_text(), path.stat().st_size)
text, size = sometempstuff()
print(f"{text}: {size}")
print(f"Exists in real FS: {Path('./testfile.txt').exists()}")
As I understand you need to be careful where you create the Path
objects as you will either get a pathlib.Path
or a FakePathlibModule.Path
. This applies not only to pathlib but pretty much the entire python stdlib.
@tfeldmann Thank you for the example, I will give it a try.
I also considered forking just the MemoryFS into a separate library, overall this package still works is just that there hasn't been any activity in 1 year, and several PR's ready to be merged