ProofGeneral / PG

Reported by @aa755 on Coq-Club:

When I enter the following in a new file, I get:

Require Import Coq.Strings.String.

Definition foo: string :=
" a
".
Set Printing All.
Compute foo.
(*
= String (Ascii.Ascii false false false false false true false false)
     (String (Ascii.Ascii true false false false false true true false)
        (String (Ascii.Ascii false false false false false true false false) EmptyString))
: string
*)
The last character of foo is a newline but it is parsed as a space (ascii 32 (0x20)).
However, when I compile it using coqc, or interactive run it in jscoq (https://coq.vercel.app/), I get the correct answer:
= String
  (Ascii.Ascii false false false false false true false false)
  (String
  (Ascii.Ascii true false false false false true true false)
  (String
  (Ascii.Ascii false true false true false false false false)
  EmptyString))
: string
-- Abhishek

FYI the culprit is this line:

PG/generic/proof-shell.el

Lines 968 to 970 in cb23709

    
              ;; Replace CRs from string with spaces to avoid spurious prompts. 
        
              (if proof-shell-strip-crs-from-input 
        
           (setq string (subst-char-in-string ?\n ?\  string)))

the upside is that this behavior is customizable.

FYI, without changing PG, the following minimal-working-example fixes the issue:

(*
 *  M-: (setq proof-shell-strip-crs-from-input nil) RET
 *)

Definition foo': string :=
" a
".
Set Printing All.
Compute foo'.
     (* = String (Ascii.Ascii false false false false false true false false) *)
     (*     (String (Ascii.Ascii true false false false false true true false) *)
     (*        (String (Ascii.Ascii false true false true false false false false) EmptyString)) *)
     (* : string *)

So as a proper fix @aa755, you can just run:

M-: (customize-save-variable 'proof-shell-strip-crs-from-input nil) RET

to automatically save this setting in your init file.

Cc @ProofGeneral/core I see that the custom proof-shell-strip-crs-from-input is not documented in the userman:

https://proofgeneral.github.io/doc/master/userman/Variable-Index/#Variable-Index

I also see that easycrypt sets this custom to nil by default:

PG/easycrypt/easycrypt.el

Line 143 in cb23709

(setq proof-shell-strip-crs-from-input nil)

So two questions:

Q1. should we just change the default to nil for Coq as well? and look for possible issues in the CI and/or from users?
(in which case I'd suggest that we don't close this but pin the issue to be more visible for some time),
but let me know if you already see (or remember) potential issues with such a change.

Q2. should we document this custom in PG's userman? saying e.g. "nil" is recommended for String-related formalizations.
IMHO I'd suggest to address Q2 (documentation) especially if the answer to Q1 is no.

Other thoughts?

This setting dates back the times when coqtop would duplicate its prompt after each newline input ad de-synch PG.
I don't know exactly when this behaviour disappeared from the coqtop -emacs but it seems quite ancient. So probably worth a try indeed imho.

OK thanks @Matafou !

FYI I did the following test:

Running docker run --rm -it coqorg/coq:8.4 coqtop -emacs

to download and run the oldest coq prebuilt in Docker-Coq, namely Coq 8.4pl6 as of April 2015.

Then proving a trivial lemma while inserting spurious newlines:

Goal
True.
Proof
.
exact
I.

And I didn't get any duplicate <prompt>.

Does this check looks enough to you?

Kind regards

Yes. Let us test what the ci says about that.

FYI: @vzaliva just reported a regression on Zulip that seems to indicate that my bugfix #774 was incomplete. Namely, regarding error reporting for commands that don't fit in a single line.

@ProofGeneral/core I'll try to take a closer look on Monday, but feel free to investigate meanwhile if you can/wish.

I can't have look now but it is strange: replacing each \n by a space should not change the computation of (char) positions of errors...

I can't have look now but it is strange: replacing each `\n` by a space should not change the computation of (char) positions of errors...

Could it be some CRLF conversion biting us?

Had a quick look. Here are the elements:

Coq error reporting in coqtop is such that the error message only cites the line containing the error, not the entire command.

<prompt>Coq < 12 || 0 < </prompt>Eval compute in
  x * trois * trois.
Toplevel input, characters 18-19:
>   x * trois * trois.
>   ^
Error: The reference x was not found in the current environment.

We need to delete the hackish legacy code for error location (which was using the number of spaces preceding the "^^^" and use the the "characters x-y:" information instead. Which is better anyways.
I will try something.

	;; Replace CRs from string with spaces to avoid spurious prompts.
	(if proof-shell-strip-crs-from-input
	(setq string (subst-char-in-string ?\n ?\ string)))

bug: newlines misparsed as space in string litterals