GLM uses radians since 0.9.6.0

[Mischa Alff]

Since version 0.9.6.0, GLM broke compatibility with previous versions to use radians instead of degrees.

I'd gladly make a PR to fix this in the code/articles, but I was wondering if it was more desirable to do e.g glm::radians(45.0f), or simply 3.1415f/4.f, or use const float pi = std::acos(-1);, and do pi/4.f?

I personally think glm::radians(45.0f) is more understandable/readable to someone who is new to graphics programming and/or inexperienced in trigonometry.

[Alexander Overvoorde]

Yes, glm::radians would make the most sense.