Why a fork for package-server-sync?
mitar opened this issue · comments
I have not seen any discussion about peerlibrary:meteor-packages
being moved to this organization, but I see a fork here: https://github.com/Meteor-Community-Packages/package-server-sync
So, I do not think anyone really asked me (I made that package) if they could take over maintenance, or even make a MR against it. So not sure why forking a package instead of taking it over? So if somebody wants to take it over, please ask. No need to duplicate packages unnecessary.
Also, if people prefer, I can move some of packages from peerlibrary
to here as well. But that is a separate discussion.
cc @copleykj
Hey @mitar. Sorry, there wasn't any discussion around this. I initially started modifying the package as part of my work to build a replacement for Atmosphere. I started to get busy and rather than keeping the changes local, and risk losing if something unexpected happened, I created a new repo here and pushed them up.
If you are willing to make the move, I'd be more than happy to shuffle things around and make that happen.
I can add you to that repository and add permissions for you to publish peerlibrary:meteor-packages
? What is your Meteor username?
Username is the same as here. Did you want to transfer the repo to this org, or keep ownership?
I would keep ownership, but transfer it here.
Also published the latest version as peerlibrary:meteor-packages@1.0.0
.
And added permissions for you so that you can publish the package under that name.