ex 3.18
burmecia opened this issue · comments
Should we add an condition to the expectation?
What about a~\pi under E? Since s is given in the left, and small s is always a particular state.
But q itself is dependen on \pi, that's why I think expectation over pi is enough.
I was following the 2nd equation notation from formula 3.14, although I think your thinking is probably right.
OK.
I will leave the annation unchanged for now.