Matching error

[longbaochenlong]

Hi, I got a error in image matching step which means "GL error in file 'D:\githublib\MVStudio-master\MVStudio\paint_canvas.cpp' @ line 163: Invalid value (A numeric argument is out of range)". It's a opengl error. I debug the project, and find the GL error code is 1821.Do you have any solutions?

[Liangliang Nan]

What is the GL Vendor, GL Version, and GLSL Version?

…

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:56 AM longbaochenlong ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, I got a error in image matching step which means "GL error in file 'D:\githublib\MVStudio-master\MVStudio\paint_canvas.cpp' @ line 163: Invalid value (A numeric argument is out of range)". It's a opengl error. I debug the project, and find the GL error code is 1821.Do you have any solutions? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWOVCDZZESMTOUR3HQUFIDSE4YKVANCNFSM4RBNLEUQ> .

[longbaochenlong]

What is the GL Vendor, GL Version, and GLSL Version?
…

[PaintCanvas] GL Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
[PaintCanvas] GL Renderer: AMD Radeon(TM) RX Vega 10 Graphics
[PaintCanvas] GL Version: 4.6.13560 Compatibility Profile Context 26.20.11030.2003
[PaintCanvas] GLSL Version: 4.60

[Liangliang Nan]

Oh, it must be Windows and it should work. Did you succeed in producing a point cloud in Release mode? Or both Release and Debug give you the same error message? Please post the ENTIRE log here.

…

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:45 AM longbaochenlong ***@***.***> wrote: What is the GL Vendor, GL Version, and GLSL Version? … [PaintCanvas] GL Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc. [PaintCanvas] GL Renderer: AMD Radeon(TM) RX Vega 10 Graphics [PaintCanvas] GL Version: 4.6.13560 Compatibility Profile Context 26.20.11030.2003 [PaintCanvas] GLSL Version: 4.60 — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWOVCDLJCW5FPQIBTGCBCLSE46CBANCNFSM4RBNLEUQ> .

[longbaochenlong]

Oh, it must be Windows and it should work.
Did you succeed in producing a point cloud in Release mode? Or both Release
and Debug give you the same error message?
Please post the ENTIRE log here.
…

The Release mode has no problem.

[Liangliang Nan]

Still, no useful information to reproduce the issue :-(

…

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:11 PM longbaochenlong ***@***.***> wrote: Oh, it must be Windows and it should work. Did you succeed in producing a point cloud in Release mode? Or both Release and Debug give you the same error message? Please post the ENTIRE log here. … The Release mode has no problem. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWOVCAQS7AXQ6DN66I5COTSE5WIJANCNFSM4RBNLEUQ> .

[longbaochenlong]

Still, no useful information to reproduce the issue :-(
…

In Debug mode,the total log info seem no error.It just output in console.

And I try to run all of the steps including image matching, sparse reconstruction and dense reconstruction in Debug mode.The result is fine, but the time cost is very high.
So,there are two questions:
Q1:What is the error meaning?
Q2:Why the efficent of Debug mode is lower than that of Release model?

[Liangliang Nan]

Q1:What is the error meaning?

The error says that there is an OpenGL call with an out-of-range argument value. It was the "last" OpenGL error, meaning it occurred somewhere before or on that line (not necessarily on that line).

Q2:Why the efficent of Debug mode is lower than that of Release model?

You can google the differences between Debug and Release. In short, Release does some (or a lot) optimization.