face registration result is very bad

[ZZSSCC]

the result in face registration is very bad, like follow, 134 landmarks is used:
source:

target:

nricp result:

fast rnrr result:

[Juyong Zhang]

Hi, how do you construct the correspondence between source and target models? If I understand correct, they have the same topologies. Besides, how do you set the weights?

[ZZSSCC]

Hi, how do you construct the correspondence between source and target models? If I understand correct, they have the same topologies. Besides, how do you set the weights?

yes, they have the same topologies, but i just use 134 landmarks, because i want to use it between different topologies. And i didn't modify the code about weights

[Juyong Zhang]

Can you send the test models and the labeled landmarks to us via [e-mail]?

[ZZSSCC]

Can you send the test models and the labeled landmarks to us via [e-mail]?

👌，thx~

[Yuxin Yao]

Hi, firstly, our method depends on geodesic calculation when sampling nodes, the geodesic code we used currently only supports closed mesh calculations, so maybe you need to fill holes first and then run it or change to a more suitable geodesic calculation method(in nodeSampler.cpp and geodesic.cpp). Secondly, the weights of regularization term and rotation term will greatly affect the results, you can adjust(decrease) them (paras.alpha and paras.beta in main.cpp) to make it more suitable for your models.

[ZZSSCC]

Hi, firstly, our method depends on geodesic calculation when sampling nodes, the geodesic code we used currently only supports closed mesh calculations, so maybe you need to fill holes first and then run it or change to a more suitable geodesic calculation method(in nodeSampler.cpp and geodesic.cpp). Secondly, the weights of regularization term and rotation term will greatly affect the results, you can adjust(decrease) them (paras.alpha and paras.beta in main.cpp) to make it more suitable for your models.

ok, i get it

[X-niper]

Hi, firstly, our method depends on geodesic calculation when sampling nodes, the geodesic code we used currently only supports closed mesh calculations, so maybe you need to fill holes first and then run it or change to a more suitable geodesic calculation method(in nodeSampler.cpp and geodesic.cpp). Secondly, the weights of regularization term and rotation term will greatly affect the results, you can adjust(decrease) them (paras.alpha and paras.beta in main.cpp) to make it more suitable for your models.

ok, i get it

Hi， Mr Zhang，

Have you finally gotten good results on face registration?