`edition` and `status` in `extra` have no effect

[Zeping Lee]

I'm working on a CSL style in China legal field. I need edition and status variables in the extra field but they have no effect in output. Is it the expected behavior? The following is a MRE.

Output:

      + expected - actual

       edition: 2005 Revision; status: abolished
      -[CSL STYLE ERROR: reference with no printed form.]
      +edition: 2013 Amendment; status: abolished

>>===== MODE =====>>
citation
<<===== MODE =====<<


>>===== RESULT =====>>
edition: 2005 Revision; status: abolished
edition: 2013 Amendment; status: abolished
<<===== RESULT =====<<


>>===== CITATION-ITEMS =====>>
[
    [
        {
            "id": "ITEM-1"
        }
    ],
    [
        {
            "id": "ITEM-2"
        }
    ]
]
<<===== CITATION-ITEMS =====<<


>>===== CSL =====>>
<style
      xmlns="http://purl.org/net/xbiblio/csl"
      class="note"
      version="1.0">
  <info>
    <id />
    <title />
    <updated>2009-08-10T04:49:00+09:00</updated>
  </info>
  <citation>
    <layout>
      <group delimiter="; ">
        <text variable="edition" prefix="edition: "/>
        <text variable="status" prefix="status: "/>
      </group>
    </layout>
  </citation>
</style>
<<===== CSL =====<<


>>===== INPUT =====>>
[
    {
        "id": "ITEM-1",
        "type": "book",
        "edition": "2005 Revision",
        "status": "abolished"
    },
    {
        "id": "ITEM-2",
        "type": "legislation",
        "extra": "edition: 2013 Amendment\nstatus: abolished"
    }
]
<<===== INPUT =====<<

[Brenton M. Wiernik]

The CSL variable is note, not extra

[Zeping Lee]

Ah, yes! It's a silly mistake.