Separate Dynamics and ConnectionRule Components into different root tags
NineML-Committee opened this issue · comments
The committee agreed that the different types of components should use different root tags.
In splitting the spec into Structure and Property layers (see #41) I have found that we could probably do without the old Component
elements, so how do you guys feel if we drop the "Class" suffix and split ComponentClass
into Dynamics
, ConnectionRule
, etc...
ok with me
Fine with me too
On 16 April 2015 at 13:55, Andrew Davison notifications@github.com wrote:
ok with me
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#94 (comment).
Alex Cope
Research Associate
Behavioural and Evolutionary Theory Lab
Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield
www.alexcope.co.uk
No objection to this.
P
On 16 April 2015 at 13:58, Alex Cope notifications@github.com wrote:
Fine with me too
On 16 April 2015 at 13:55, Andrew Davison notifications@github.com
wrote:ok with me
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#94 (comment).Alex Cope
Research Associate
Behavioural and Evolutionary Theory Lab
Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield
www.alexcope.co.uk—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#94 (comment).
Dr Paul Richmond (Research Fellow) - University of Sheffield
http://www.paulrichmond.staff.shef.ac.uk
p.richmond@sheffield.ac.uk
Department of Computer Science http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/dcs
Sheffield NVIDIA CUDA Research Centre
http://gpucomputing.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/
Advanced Computing Research Centre http://www.acrc.com
Sounds good to me.