RFC005 - བསླབ་གཞི་(ཨ་ར་པ་ཙ་)དང་ཡིག་རྒྱུགས་ཀྱི་དྲི་ཤོག་ཏུ་བརྙན་དང་། པར་རིས། མགུལ་རིས་གསར་པ་བཟོ་སྒྲིག་དང་ཡར་རྒྱས་གཏོང་བར་དགེ་རྒན་ལ་རམ་འདེགས་བྱེད་རྒྱུ།

Question

RFC005 - བསླབ་གཞི་(ཨ་ར་པ་ཙ་)དང་ཡིག་རྒྱུགས་ཀྱི་དྲི་ཤོག་ཏུ་བརྙན་དང་། པར་རིས། མགུལ་རིས་གསར་པ་བཟོ་སྒྲིག་དང་ཡར་རྒྱས་གཏོང་བར་དགེ་རྒན་ལ་རམ་འདེགས་བྱེད་རྒྱུ།

wangmotamotsang opened this issue 2 years ago · comments

WANGMO commented 2 years ago

RFJ དྲ་ཐག RFJ link: #8

འགན་འཁུར་བ། Job owner's GitHub username:@wangmotamotsang

ལག་བསྟར་བ། Team lead's GitHub username: @choboy

ལས་གྲོགས། Teammates' GitHub usernames:

1. བརྡ་ཆད་ངོ་སྤྲོད། Keyword definitions

ཚིག་གསར་བྱང་བུ།
མགུལ་རིས།
བརྙན་ཐུང་།
རི་མོ།
དཔར་རིས།

2. ངོ་སྤྲོད་མདོར་བསྡུས། Summary

ཨ་ར་པ་ཙའི་དྲ་རྒྱའི་ནང་གི་པར་དང་་། མགུལ་རིས། བརྙན་ཐུང་རྣམས་གསར་པ་བཟོ་སྒྲིག་བྱས་ཏེ། སློབ་ཕྲུག་རྣམས་ཀྱིས་དགེ་རྒན་ལ་མ་ལྟོས་པར་རང་ངོས་ནས་སློབ་སྦྱོང་བྱེད་ཐུབ་ཅིང་། ཡིག་རྒྱུགས་ཀྱི་དྲི་ཤོག་ཏུ་གནས་རིམ་འདྲ་མིན་ལ་གཞིགས་ནས་རི་མོ་དང་། མགུལ་རིས་ཁ་སྣོན་བྱེད་རྒྱུ།

3. གྲུབ་འབྲས་ཚད་ལྡན་ངོ་སྤྲོད། Definition of Acceptable End Result

By the end of this project, we will have a fully-fledged website of Arapatsa which is currently inconsistent in terms of content, animation, illustration, graphics, etc.
Later the students will have a better understanding of the Arapatsa courses through improved or new illustrations added to the website courses before attending the actual class.

MDP5: GRAPHIC DESIGN RUBRIC

Criteria Advanced Proficient Average Below Average Far Below Average

Required Element The design includes all required elements as well as additional information. All required elements are included in the design. All but 1 of the required elements are included in the design. Several required elements were missing. Most of the required elements were absent.

Clarity of message Text is bold, compelling and possibly multi-layered. It goes beyond the obvious. Text is clear and compelling. May not be as obvious as it could be. Text is clear but fails to go beyond something simple or obvious. Text is slightly confusing. Text is absent or contradictory.

Creativity The design demonstrates a unique level of originality. The design demonstrates originality. The designs lack sincere originality. The design shows little evidence of originality. The design shows no evidence of originality.

Graphics Relevance All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand. All the graphics are related to the topic and mostly easy to understand. All graphics relate to the topic. Graphics are partially related to the topic. Graphics are not related to the topic.

Attractiveness The design is exceptional in terms of design, layout, and neatness. The design is attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. The design is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy. The design is distractingly messy. It isn’t attractive. The design is very poorly designed and far from attractive.

Consistency Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as component format, are carefully chosen to produce consistent narratives across the lessons. Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as component format usage are somewhat consistent with little inappropriate variation. Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as component format usage are randomly chosen with few consistent elements throughout. Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as format usage are randomly chosen. Graphics seem unrelated. Lack of consistency.

Submission deadline On time and within 1 day. 2-3 days late. 4-5 days late. More than 5 days. —-

Note: Below average and far from below average will be considered as rejected. He/She has to remake it until approved.

4. ཐབས་ལམ་གཞན། Alternative Approaches

1 Directly explore and use the illustration available online that are suitable for the particular courses without any customization.
2 Drawing each subject in Adobe photoshop or illustrator and editing them in Adobe premiere pro.
3. Getting the illustration from online sites and using them in Adobe premiere pro.

5. ཐབས་ལམ་འདི་འདེམ་དོན་ཅི་ཡིན། Reason for Chosing the Current Approach

1 Time efficient.
2 Wide range of options available on Freepik and Canva website for the illustration of the courses.
3 Better output.

6. ལས་ཀ་སྤྱིའི་རིམ་པ། Milestones

For the first few weeks, I did research on the structure of the first few Arapatsa website lessons. Based on that study, I did make a few samples of animated videos and illustrations as a trial. After the trial, I was told that my illustration was enough to make students a better understanding of the lesson.
I was told that there will be a weekly inspection of my submitted work so the quality of my work depends on the feedback that I will receive from teachers and students on weekly basis.

7. རིམ་པ་སོ་སོའི་གྲུབ་འབྲས་ཚད་ལྡན་གྱི་དཔེ་མཚོན་དང་ལག་ལེན་གྱི་དྲན་ཐོ། Result Examples and Checklist for Each Milestone

a) An example of an acceptable result is when the student is able to understand the lesson or proceed with the exercises with the help of illustrations without any instructor.

b) To avoid bad results, I need to constantly keep in my mind that I need to make simple illustrations for the students who are learning Tibetan as their second language.

c) I was told that there will be a weekly inspection of my submitted work so the quality of my work depends on the feedback that I will receive from teachers and students on weekly basis.

8. རྒྱུ་ཆ་ཁག Resources and Useful References

Software: Adobe Photoshop and illustrator
Website: Canva, Freepik, bodyiglobjong

9. ཉེན་ཁ་དང་ཉེན་སྲུང་། Risks and risk reduction

Things that may go wrong with my plan:
1 With the inappropriate search term for a particular lesson may lead to irrelevant illustration output.
2 With the lack of feedback and inspection, the Output result might not be appealing to the student.
3 With the inconsistency Arapatsa website lesson might lead to a delay in the project completion.

To reduce the risk:
1 Spend more time surfing online, (on Freepik or Canva website) to have a relevant illustration.
2 Hoping for regular and active feedback on my weekly report.
3 Hopefully there isn’t any blank lesson on the Arapatsa site.

10. ངེས་མེད་ཀྱི་དོགས་འདྲི། Open questions

I need to know which lesson am I covering per week prior to the work and what are the student expectations which later I will know from their feedback.

11. སྤུས་ཀ་སྟངས་འཛིན་གྱི་བརྒྱུད་རིམ། Quality Control Procedure

I will submit my work to Ms. Wangmo la on weekly basis and then she will show it to the concerned student or staff for feedback. They will approve if I am able to get a good grade on my submitted work otherwise, I have to make another attempt. So, the quality of my work depends on the feedback that I will receive from teachers and students on weekly basis.

12. ཡིག་ཆ་དང་ལས་བསྡོམས་འབུལ་ཕྱོགས། Documentation and Reporting

I will submit my work on a weekly basis to the concerned staff via google drive or any means that are appropriate for the particular graphics.
I will update my working hours on Google calendar.

13. ལས་ཀའི་ཆ་ཤས་རྣམས། Work Items

For the animation video:
Step1. I thought of using the illustration available on the Freepik website as most of them are in vector format.
Step 2. Readjust the downloaded illustration in Adobe photoshop or illustrator.
Step 3. Import those images on the Canva website and start making the animation video with the script available on the Arapatsa website.

For the illustration:
Step 1: Explore the illustration available on websites or draw each one in Adobe Photoshop or illustrator and later use them for the illustration of a particular lesson.

Criteria	Advanced	Proficient	Average	Below Average	Far Below Average
Required Element	The design includes all required elements as well as additional information.	All required elements are included in the design.	All but 1 of the required elements are included in the design.	Several required elements were missing.	Most of the required elements were absent.
Clarity of message	Text is bold, compelling and possibly multi-layered. It goes beyond the obvious.	Text is clear and compelling. May not be as obvious as it could be.	Text is clear but fails to go beyond something simple or obvious.	Text is slightly confusing.	Text is absent or contradictory.
Creativity	The design demonstrates a unique level of originality.	The design demonstrates originality.	The designs lack sincere originality.	The design shows little evidence of originality.	The design shows no evidence of originality.
Graphics Relevance	All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand.	All the graphics are related to the topic and mostly easy to understand.	All graphics relate to the topic.	Graphics are partially related to the topic.	Graphics are not related to the topic.
Attractiveness	The design is exceptional in terms of design, layout, and neatness.	The design is attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.	The design is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy.	The design is distractingly messy. It isn’t attractive.	The design is very poorly designed and far from attractive.
Consistency	Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as component format, are carefully chosen to produce consistent narratives across the lessons.	Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as component format usage are somewhat consistent with little inappropriate variation.	Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as component format usage are randomly chosen with few consistent elements throughout.	Storyline features such as characters, graphics features such as art or fonts style, course elements features such as format usage are randomly chosen. Graphics seem unrelated.	Lack of consistency.
Submission deadline	On time and within 1 day.	2-3 days late.	4-5 days late.	More than 5 days.	—-