Add support for options that are necessary for using a shared tunnel
miherlosev opened this issue · comments
Hi,
Do you have any updates on this issue so far?
I submitted the original question from Stackoverflow link above.
For some additional background - many companies use SauceLabs' shared tunnels to provide a secure connection from SauceLabs VM Farms to their infrastructure behind a firewall.
Shared Tunnels are a preferred way of connecting, instead of individual tunnels, because they provide higher bandwidth and concurrency.
I'm unable to provide you with any time frame as any personal estimate may be misleading. We need time to investigate this problem. Once we get any results, I assure you that we will notify you.
There is an open pull request (that has been approved) in the saucelabs-connector library that addresses this issue:
Do you have any influence there to get this pull request added? Looks like it was approved 7 months ago, but not integrated.
Hello,
Thank you for your question. The pull request you referenced is only partially approved, we can't merge it yet.
Looks like the pull request referenced above has since been merged