Should we allow bonus points?
oleks opened this issue · comments
I had this feature in my shell-scripted format. The idea was that the syntax was slightly different for "bonus judgements":
# Theory: /50
## Question 1: 5/10
## Question 2: 5/20
## Question 3: 5/20
## Bonus: +5
The template would then be
## Bonus: +0
Bonus points should be accounted separately to keep the overflow counts as they are, and to make bonus points selectively applicable (i.e., only if need be).
I find it a good idea.
When making the grading sheets for CompSys, I was thinking of taking out
some points for a final distribution. I have previously found that I
sometimes adjust some random points i make take it to the level that I find
reasonable. Having a way to make this adjustment clear and be able to add a
reason, would be great.
…On 17 January 2017 at 21:01, Oleks ***@***.***> wrote:
@kirkedal <https://github.com/kirkedal> What do you think?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB15lm--aF9wgWdfqE8HeuIt7XFp5iPmks5rTR4pgaJpZM4LmDa8>
.
Done, except that bonus points are not accounted for separately, but just contribute to an overall sum. Incidentally, computed sums may exceed the maximum by design.