Casecommons / pg_search

pg_search builds ActiveRecord named scopes that take advantage of PostgreSQL’s full text search

Home Page:http://www.casebook.net

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

A question about searching associations not a bug

scopethis opened this issue · comments

Hi, I'm just getting my head around pg_search and I have a question regarding associations.

Given the following simple setup

class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :reviews
end

class Review < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :book
end

There is no joining table in this scenario. Just two tables: books and reviews.
If I wanted to grab all reviews and their associated book. I could do something like

Review.joins(:book).select('reviews.*', 'books.*')

This should return a list of repeated book names with their review.
I assumed I would be able to do something like:

class Review < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :book

  pg_search_scope :search, 
    against: {comment: 'A'},
    associated_against: {
       book: {name: 'B'}
    },
    using: { tsearch: { dictionary: 'english' } }
end
Review.joins(:book).select('reviews.*', 'books.*')
  .search('Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a page turner.')

Is that possible? Or have i missed something?

Scopes from pg_search are chainable, just like any other scope, so I think the general answer to your question is yes.

It would be more conventional to do this, I would think:

Review.search('Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a page turner.').includes(:book)

And you'd get Review records where you could call Review#book to retrieve the book.

e.g. (a rough sketch)

reviews = Review.search('Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a page turner.').includes(:book)

review = reviews.first

review # => <#Review text="I think that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is a real page turner, don't you agree?">

review.book #=> <#Book title="Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows">