dependency `python-suds` does not work on MacOSX
dilawar opened this issue · comments
I've install suds using pip yet the moosegui does not launch: (On MacOSX).
File "/opt/local/lib/moose/gui/biomodelsclient.py", line 49, in <module>
from suds.client import Client
ImportError: No module named suds.client
This is probably related to this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14973852/suds-install-error-no-module-named-client
pip install suds-jurko or (easy_install suds-jurko) does not remove the problem. Both packages are also in MacPort. Installing them also does not remove the issue.
suds-0.4 . Works on Ubuntu - 14.04 with pip install.
Works with suds-jurko on MacOSX. Does not work with suds. Using suds-jurko as dependency now. It is a good idea to
- Either keep working suds in code-repository as external module.
- Or update the suds on pypi.
I removed python-suds from my system which is ubunut 12.04 and installed
suds-jurko, then gui launches without any problem.
so we can removed python-suds and install suds-jurko one package for both
Ubuntu and mac, but need to check for windows.
Harsha
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Dilawar Singh notifications@github.com
wrote:
Works with suds-jurko on MacOSX. Does not work with suds. Using suds-jurko
as dependency now. It is a good idea to
- Either keep working suds in code-repository as external module.
- Or update the suds on pypi.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment).
I wrote that code back in 2010 and the original suds module has been discontinued long since: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7817303/what-soap-libraries-exist-for-python-3-x. In between we had stopped shipping the biomodels client with moosegui. Decide if it is still desired. If so Jurko's fork suds-jurko seems to be the right module (as you have already figured out).
@hrani Can biomodels be dropped from gui ?
why do you want to remove biomodel client? when suds-jurko can be installed and works fine atleast on Ubuntu and same can be checked on mac and windows.
Suds-jurko is not available as package on many RPM based distros. Python-suds is
available. If no one is maintaining bioModels or it is not used at all, we can
deprecate the folder and reduce one dependencies.
best,
Dilawar
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:16:50AM -0800, HarshaRani wrote:
why do you want to remove biomodel client? when suds-jurko can be installed and works fine atleast on Ubuntu and same can be checked on mac and windows.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#4 (comment)
Out of habit please don't go a head and delete the files.
BioModels is one if database which is active currently So I am sure that they are maintaining it I can check that.
Can you let me know to what all distribution you are trying to packaging.
Fedora, centos, Ubunut, mac (which one) and windows (which one)
I will check if there is a common module which is present which can be used for all the distribution
For time being if this the time limiting factor for your packaging then I have commented those lines in mgui and biomodel.py file which should not created problems now.
If you still have problems let me know
I've finished the packaging with ghevar_3.0.2. tag. This commit, and I noticed everyone over email. This commit is submitted with its sha256. We can take this up in next bug-fixes release. On unix, there does not seem to be a problem on recent versions. The list of distribution is here.
For mac: 10.9, 10.10 and 10.11.
I am not packaging for windows at all.
Using python-suds-jurko on most of the distributions.
Not available on CentOS-6 .
Added suds to source code in pull request #9
This has been fixed by recent merge of pull request #9