Azure / Azure-Verified-Modules

Azure Verified Modules (AVM) is an initiative to consolidate and set the standards for what a good Infrastructure-as-Code module looks like. Modules will then align to these standards, across languages (Bicep, Terraform etc.) and will then be classified as AVMs and available from their respective language specific registries.

Home Page:https://aka.ms/AVM

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

[Module Proposal]: avm-ptn-finopstoolkit-finopshub

didayal-msft opened this issue ยท comments

Check for previous/existing GitHub issues/module proposals

  • I have checked for previous/existing GitHub issues/module proposals.

Check this module doesn't already exist in the module indexes

  • I have checked for that this module doesn't already exist in the module indexes.

Bicep or Terraform?

Terraform

Module Classification?

Pattern Module

Module Name

finops-toolkit-finops-hub

Module Details

Terraform module for FinOps toolkit's hub.
Details here: https://microsoft.github.io/finops-toolkit/hubs/template

Do you want to be the owner of this module?

Yes

Module Owner's GitHub Username (handle)

didayal-msft

(Optional) Secondary Module Owner's GitHub Username (handle)

No response

Important

The "Needs: Triage ๐Ÿ”" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the AVM Issue Triage documentation.

Note

This label was added as per ITA06.

Note

The "Language: Terraform ๐ŸŒ" label was added as per ITA14.

@didayal-msft, thanks for volunteering to be a module owner!

Important

Please don't start the development just yet!

The AVM core team will review this module proposal and respond to you first. Thank you!

Note

This message was posted as per ITA17.

Note

The "Status: Owners Identified ๐Ÿค˜" label was added as per ITA16.

@didayal-msft can you provide confirmation from FonOps toolkit team that you will drive this development in their name?

This will be on hold until we get confirmation from FinOps toolkit team. @flanakin for visibility.

Yes @prjelesi this needs to be on hold as per last week's discussion. We will wait for bicep pattern module and see demand as well as review overhead of managing 2 modules. For now this can be put on hold or closed as per procedure.

I believe @sebassem is already working on this ๐Ÿ™‚