When CalcyIV doesn't find the arc-point, the previous clipboard bypasses the renamer as if it was a successful scan

[emi~]

The title says it all. Very easy to fix.

We can either:

• Clear the clipboard after each pokémon (via clipper.set), or
• Add another regex to ivcheck.py with Did not find arc-point indicating the level

See persistent_clipboard_bug.log for an example with Kangaskhan, one that scans successfully and one that has the arc-point exactly besides its head.

The first solution looks more robust to me, but has the drawback of being more resource-intensive (i.e.: slower), the second solution follows the current implementation and is ridiculously easy to implement.

What do you think?

[emi~]

Just realized the script already checks for -1 on the RE_CALCY_IV's values["level"], and the issue seems intermittent.

I've managed to catch one log were it works once and fails on the next attempt, with a print(values) on success (unfortunately I've messed up and didn't add a print(values) before the check, so the first fail that actually was detected didn't print the values list, but I'm sure it was exactly the same).

🤔

[scott]

I've been able to reproduce this.

I think this pulls '-1.0' type values for the level. I think it should be -1? Could be updated in the regex to grab only the integer string part maybe. I put together some spaghetti that seemed to work for me anyway with:

if '-1' in [values["cp"], values["level"]] or '-1.0' in [values["cp"], values["level"]]:

Here's what I got for the vals it incorrectly considered a successful scan
{'name': 'Wailmer', 'id': '320', 'cp': '-1', 'max_hp': '150', 'dust_cost': '2200', 'level': '-1.0', 'fast_move': 'err', 'special_move': 'err', 'gender': '1', 'success': False, 'blacklist': False, 'appraised': False}

----edit----
I somehow managed to copy a bad test above. Here is a better example:

{'name': 'Wailmer', 'id': '320', 'cp': '602', 'max_hp': '142', 'dust_cost': '1900', 'level': '-1.0', 'fast_move': 'err', 'special_move': 'err', 'gender': '1', 'success': True, 'blacklist': False, 'appraised': False}

[Alfie Day]

@kruppe11 submitted a PR for this which I have merged. Issue should be resolved now. Thanks again, good catch! :)