Number.isNaN() might be faster?

Question

Number.isNaN() might be faster?

leeoniya opened this issue 3 years ago · comments

Leon Sorokin commented 3 years ago

@AsyncBanana

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33164725/confusion-between-isnan-and-number-isnan-in-javascript/33165410#33165410

untested, but from the description sounds like it could be.

Leon Sorokin · Answer 1 · Sun Nov 07 2021 06:18:43 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

also, i'm no mathematician, but lolwut? are you trying to say 2x+ faster?

Jacob Jackson · Answer 2 · Sun Nov 07 2021 07:29:58 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Yeah, I checked that out but the automatic transformation was needed for things like dates.
Also, yes, I meant double the speed. Thanks for pointing that out as something that could be clarified. You could submit a PR if you want, or I could try to clarify it.

Jacob Jackson · Answer 3 · Tue Nov 09 2021 08:01:27 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

I have now clarified the speed, so I am going to close this.