Consider adding V to the Forest
rklaehn opened this issue · comments
It seems like forest is emerging as just a convenient package of stuff (caches etc.). Maybe it is even more convenient to have V in there as well..
you mean “V for Vendetta”?
Surprised that anybody except for me reads these things. I mean V for Value. Currently a Forest does not care about the value, and a tree has the V type parameter. But it turns out that the individual tree is not that useful for what we want to do...
Just gonna try this out.