Plan to TREs for comment
jim-smith opened this issue · comments
Questions for TRE's to discuss
-
Is it ok that the. query results don't get written to file until the usr calls acro.finalise()?
- Has implications for our renaming functionality
- but what if the user forgets! how do we prompt them?
-
Imagine a user goes off home, or for lunch etc., so calls finalise to save their work so far.
- When they come back, do we want to do we want be able to restart a session or start a new one?
- This has implications for being able to delete things if they decide they don't want them.
- would TREs prefer to see could we have functionality that let them have a choice here?
-
(relates to 2) At present we have added timestamps to the end of output names, because of the issue of a second session restarting counting from 0, so over-writing files. What would TREs prefer?
- we could automatically reload the previous session
- which might get lengthy if they work over an extended period of time,
- but would be fine if they organised different stands of work into separate folders
- is that realistic?
- does each project get given its own user area or folder/sub-directory?
Do they prefer word doc then copy into their own python environment?
or python code with comments?
---We need a set of questions for them to think about
Goes to
Kate O'Sullivan at Dash/Aberdeen
Amy Tilbrook at Data loch
Pete Stokes & Seb Bacon at OpenSafely (Oxford)
Shahzad and Chris Cole at Dundee/HIC
Michael Sibley at eDRIS (Public Health Scotland)
Closed via email to partners 03/05/2023