FedRAMP Past Performance

[Patrick McConnell]

Question/Comment on FedRamp Dashboard RFQ

Name and affiliation

Patrick McConnell, SemanticBits CTO, SemanticBits Agile BPA POC

Section of RFQ documents

In RFQ.md:

The offeror shall provide short summaries of two (2) front-end dashboards that have been delivered for previous clients

Recent, similar size, and technical scope are defined below: Similar Size: Similar size is equal to or greater than four (4) t five (5) Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff having performed on project with a period of performance of two (2) months or more

Phase 1: Compliance Check. The Contracting Officer will review all offers to ensure compliance with the instructions and requirements set forth in the solicitation. Offerors that are not compliant with the solicitation will not be considered in the next phase.

Question/Comment

Would inclusion of three past performance examples be considered non-compliant and exclude the offeror from Phase 2?

Would past performance of a prototype, open source, highly relevant Minimal Viable Product (MVP) that had a duration less than 2 months but required 4-5 personnel be considered non-compliant and exclude the offeror from phase 2? As the government knows, MVPs usually take 1-2 sprints and are a critical aspect of the Agile DS process.

[Jessie]

Thanks for this feedback. We are going to update the RFQ on eBuy shortly to reflect a change. Projects up to 3 months of work and up to 6 personnel will be considered compliant.